Translate

Minggu, 16 Maret 2014

PAPER OS SOCIOLINGUISTICS




THE COMPARISON BETWEEN SMA AND SMK STUDENTS FOCUSED ON SOCIAL LANGUAGE
Abstract
By: Dinni Muhlisina Binangkit
Universitas Suryakancana Cianjur

            People need language to communicate their thought to the others. Language is used to convey opinion, feeling and idea. It is also used to get information or share information. Language is needed wheter it is written or spoken. Language is very necessary for people as a mean of communication.
In this study is to extent the student’s social language for the students of SMA 1 Pasundan and SMK Ar-Rahmah.
             This research aimed to knowing what some reasons and what things that can  influence the differences of social language so that we can know how to used the language in  the correct context.
            The author took 5 students of the second year students of SMA and 5 students of SMK as the sample. Data collection consisted of surveys on the road in front of their school after they school is about on Friday, December 13th 2013 is about at 01 pm. and then on Saturday December 14th 2013, we went to SMK Ar-Rahmah at 12.30 pm. Initially, a survey instrument to measure students language. The author as a complete observer, without verbal communications. Method of collection data by means of observationing surveillance directly at  the location. The observation focused on the social language of the subject. The instruments that used are check list which list of responden’s names and factors that researched and rating scole which made some notes. The conclusion of this study is the second year students of SMA 1 Pasundan and SMK Ar-Rahmah employed different social language. It shows that SMK students that used impolite language and SMA that used more polite, and for some girls put on make up too much compared SMA students that more simple make up when they at school. These are caused by influenced some factors such as physical condition, personality, education and environment.

Keywords: Social languages of students Senior High School and Vocational High School in Cianjur, influence of language for attitudes


Introduction
            Speech is used in different ways among different groups of people.  As we will see, each group has it’s own norms of linguistic behavior. A particular group may not encourage talking for the sake of talking, and members of such a group may feel over whelmed by the demands made on them if those others insist on talking. In contrast, in another group talk may be encouraged to the extent that it may even appear to be quite disorderly to an observer who has internalized a different set of ‘rules’ for the conduct of talk. We must try to understand how different groups of people use their language (or languages) if we are to achieve a comprhehensive understanding of how that language (or those languages) is related to the society that uses it. (Ronald Wardhaugh, 2006, p. 242)

Literature Review
            There is theorie underpinning this research. It is related to social languages as follow:  Ethonographies
a.    Ethnographies
It is a study of individual culture, it is primarily a descriptive and non interpretative study.

b.    Varieties of Talk
It is instructive to look at some of the ways in which variety people in the world use talk, or sometimes the absence of talk, i.e., silence, to communicate. For example, Marshall (1961) has indicated how the ! Kung,
c.    The Ethnography of Speaking
 Hymes (1974) has proposed an ethnographic framework which takes into account the various factors that are involved in speaking. An ethnography of a communicative event is a description of all factors that are relevant in understanding how that particular communicative event achieves its objectives. For convenience, Hymes uses the word SPEAKING as an acronym for the various factors he deems to be relevant.
The Factors of Ethnography of Speaking (SPEAKING)
1.    The Setting and Scene (S)
Setting refers to the time and place, i.e., the concrete physical circumstances in which speech takes place. Within a particular setting, of course, participants are free to change scenes, as they change the level of formality (e.g., from serious to joyful).  Scene refers to the abstract phycological setting, or the cultural definition of the accasion.


2.    The participants (P) include various combinations of speaker-listener, addressor-addressee, or sender-receiver
They generally fill certain socially specified roles. A two-person conversation involves a speaker and hearer whose roles change; a ‘dressing down’ involves a speaker and hearer with no role change; a political speech involves an addressor and addressees (the audience); and a telephone message involves a sender and a receiver.
3.    Ends (E)
Ends refers to the conventionally recognized and expected outcomes of an exchange as well as to the personal goals that participants seek to accomplish on particular occasions. A trial in a courtroom  has a recognizable social in view, but the various participants, i.e., the judge, jury, prosecution, defense, accused, and witnesses, have different personal goals.
4.    Act Sequence (A)
Act sequence refers to the actual form and content of what is said: the precise words used, and the relationship of what is said to the actual fact topic at hand.
5.    Key (K)
The fifth term refers to the tone, manner, or spirit in which a particular message is conveyed: light-hearted, serious, precise, pedantice, mocking, sarcastic, pompous, and so on. The key may also be marked nonverbally by certain kinds of behavior, gesture, posture, or even deportment.
6.    Instrumentalities (I)
Instrumentalities refers to the choice of channel, e.g., oral, written, or telegraphic, and to  the actual forms of speech employed, such as the language, dialect, code, or register that is chosen. Formal, written, legal language is one instrumentality; spoken Newfoundland English is another
7.    Norms of Interaction and interpretation (N)
It is refers to the spesipic behavior and properties that attach to speaking and also to how these may be viewed by someone who does not share them, e.g., loudness, silence, gaze return, and so on. For example, there are certain norms of interaction with regard to church services and and conversing with strangers.
8.    Genre (G)
Genre refers to clearly demarcated types of utterance; such things as poems, proverbs, riddles, sermons, prayers, lectures, and editorials. These are all marked in specific ways in contrast to casual speech. Of course, in the middle of a prayer, a casual aside would be marked too.
d.    Ethnomethodology
Ethnomethodology is that branch of sociology which is concerned, among other things, with talk viewed in this way. Ethnometodologists are intersested in such metters as how people interact, solve common problems, maintain social contact, perform routine activities, and show that they know what is going on around them and communicate that knowledge to others. (Ronald Wardhaugh, 2006, p. 247)


Research Methodology
This type of study is called as observation non participation
Observation non participation is observation without researcher in implemantation as participant or group that researched. any people use this way. Disadventage of this way, there is a stalker that can be influence attitude who will be stalk.
Instrumen yang digunakan dalam melakukan observasi, yaitu checklist, rating scale, anecdotal record, catatan berkala, dan mechanical device.
a. Check list,  list of respondents name and list of factors will be stalk.
b. Rating scale, an instrument to write some symptoms by their level.
c. Anecdotal record, a note that made by researcher about an amazing attitude which shown by respondent.
d. Mechanical device,  is used for taking a picture some event to show by respondent.

Finding and Discussion
            After axamining, analyzing and interpreting data, there are some facts reveal from this research as it  is explicated below:
There are many factor to influence for teensagers in the language:
1.    Physical condition
Strong influence on the physical condition of adolences adjustment process.
2.    Personality
Willingness, ability to change, self-regulating, self-realization, and intelligence areelements of personality.
3.    Education
Learning, experience, training, and self isterminatedelementsin education.
4.    Enviorment
Environtment as variables that affected the adjustment, including family,school and community.






SMA 1 PASUNDAN
SMK AR-RAHMAH
Ø  More polite in communicate.They communicate to others with slang words as far as they know who’s people want to talk. Usually, they only use slang words with their truly friends, if they meet with a stranger or an older people, they use a formal language.
Ø  Every sentences have meaning.
Ø  Always speak slowly, but a little bit loudly.
Ø  Every see a girl, they always flirting.

Eexample: there are groups of SMA students, and when a girl pass them, they talk to her “Neng aya salam.”



Ø  Impolite in communicate.They communicate to others with slang words, for example, they always use an animal language or a bad language (ribaldry), such as bagong, anjing, sia, kehed, etc.and these words use for all of people without know them so well.
Ø  Every sentences have meaningless.
Ø  Always speak loudly.
Ø  Every see a girl, they always flirting and telling something annoying that hurt people.
Example, there are groups of SMK Ar-Rahmah, and when a girl pass them, they talk to her “Hey nenggelisih, mun teungalieuk janda.” or “Hey jablay nya?”.




Conclusions and Recommendations
Based on findings and a study above, we can take a lesson that as a young child and as an educated people, it becomes very important if we are to interact with the older use a standard language. Although the standard language is important, but this method is not always used to everyone. Therefore, there are circumstances when we have to talk raw with people that we are headed. Do not let us talk raw with peers or playmates, instead will be underestimated. Use everyday language when we first seen talking to whom. When we are speaking, we should still remain familiar and understand the context of the conversation to build good communication



BIBLIOGRAPGY

Wardhaugh, Ronald (2006) An Introduction to Sociolinguistics, Blackwell Publishing,    
 USA


           
 

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar